> On 5 Oct 2017, at 10:51, Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sure. > It probably skipped Esteban view.
I talked yesterday with Ben. As long as is backward compatible (and should be), I’m ok. Esteban > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Having the discussions scattered in Pharo-dev vm-dev github may help >> extending the indecision phase... >> >> There has been another important thread in vm-dev (Validation builds >> failing) >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2017-June/025417.html >> >> The conclusion was that we ask for some Pharo authority to approve the >> change >> We thus asked for Esteban's blessing, but unfortunately it seems that you >> have assigned much more work to Esteban without taking the precaution to >> clone him first... IMO you need about 4 or 5 Esteban. >> >> If Pharo is OK, then we can just accept the PR and clean a bit the list of >> stale PR >> >> 2017-10-02 15:21 GMT+02:00 Stephane Ducasse <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Esteban, Eliot, Clement was is the process to get this fix in the VM? >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Peter Uhnák <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Ah, perfect. Thanks! >>>> >>>> peter >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 8:41 AM, K K Subbu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sunday 01 October 2017 11:27 AM, Peter Uhnák wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> why does executing `pharo --help` return exit status 1? The operation >>>>>> succeeded, so I don't see a reason for a failure return state. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is a bug. See the thread at >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://forum.world.st/Re-Pharo-dev-pharo-help-returns-exit-code-1-on-ubuntu-td4945756.html >>>>> >>>>> The proposed fix is pending review at: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/pull/136 >>>>> >>>>> Regards .. Subbu >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
