I’ll write a README with some instructions to avoid clash when merging pull 
requests.

For example, each participant could create a directory with its name and put 
all his stuff inside it.

Julien

> Le 22 nov. 2017 à 21:09, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Tx I forked it. 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Julien <julien.delplan...@inria.fr 
> <mailto:julien.delplan...@inria.fr>> wrote:
> Ok I created one [1], maybe if multiple people are playing with me we can 
> gather the different solutions we get for each puzzle in this repository.
> 
> Julien
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/juliendelplanque/AdventOfCode2017WithPharo 
> <https://github.com/juliendelplanque/AdventOfCode2017WithPharo>
> 
>> Le 22 nov. 2017 à 16:55, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:stepharo.s...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> Julien 
>> 
>> could you open a github project so that we can do the same as norviq?
>> And get a log of the problems and solution?
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Serge Stinckwich 
>> <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com <mailto:serge.stinckw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> BTW, the Japanese Smalltalk community is doing an advent Calendar every year:
>> 
>> https://qiita.com/advent-calendar/2016/smalltalk 
>> <https://qiita.com/advent-calendar/2016/smalltalk>
>> 
>> The 2017 edition is in preparation here: 
>> https://qiita.com/advent-calendar/2017/smalltalk 
>> <https://qiita.com/advent-calendar/2017/smalltalk>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:stepharo.s...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi pharoers
>> 
>> I would like to know if you would like to participate to
>> http://adventofcode.com/2016 <http://adventofcode.com/2016>
>> 
>> For example we could do the same as
>> https://github.com/norvig/pytudes/blob/master/ipynb/Advent%20of%20Code.ipynb 
>> <https://github.com/norvig/pytudes/blob/master/ipynb/Advent%20of%20Code.ipynb>
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC/UY1)
>> "Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for 
>> machines to execute."
>> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ <http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/>
> 
> 

Reply via email to