> On 13 Jan 2018, at 14:21, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think that some people are talking without really understanding. Let > me shed some light > > - Iceberg uses the Monticello meta model to compute models and store > information in Git (files). > - Now Monticello just stores the information in zip files. > - In addition Pharo itself is doing the diff model and does not let > git doing the diff between models. > So I do not understand why Iceberg is less Smalltalk centric than Envy > or Store (BTW about store > I would have a lot to say about the industrial strength of the product > - one db expert look at the model > and he was realllllllly surprised.). > > - Now what Git gives us is that we can manage C, Pharo, PNG, css, .... > the same way. > In addition you may not like git (I do not like git personally but I > really love the model) and we > need to have a real decentralized source versioning control system. We > are not afraid by sharing :) > and collaborating. The world is using Git and we are too. > The situation will improve and it will continue to improve. > > > Now it looks like the great smalltalk community does not like when > people get some traction. > I cannot do much for them. Do not participate, complain and tell us > that we are plain idiots and that this is our fault. > Now nobody force anyone to use Pharo. > > We will continue and I'm confident that we will have success.
This is a clear, factual and to the point response, and I fully agree, let's move on. Sven
