https://pharo.manuscript.com/f/cases/21237/Remove-UndefinedObject-suspend
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/798 > On 22 Nov 2017, at 21:25, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Guillermo Polito > <guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, it doesn't sound right. I vote for removal :) > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > It sounds like a left over... > no time stamp in Squeak, so it must be old. > Display reverse; reverse means we wanted to catch when such oddity was > necessary. > (I would do it differently with an Exception and a MessageTally like I > already exhibited several times) > The fact that reverse; reverse was commented is more difficult to > interpret... Is it really necessary? > I removed the method in a Squeak image, and so fare nothing wrong happened, > but it does not prove anything. > The best is to ask in Squeak lists, maybe someone can remember... > Or carefully analyze all senders of suspend... > > 2017-11-18 22:36 GMT+01:00 Aliaksei Syrel <alex.sy...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I was looking at nil (already funny) and found a very interesting method: > > suspend > > "Kills off processes that didn't terminate properly" > > > "Display reverse; reverse." "<-- So we can catch the suspend bug" > > > Processor terminateActive > It means that the following code is probably the shortest way to kill your > image (save first!) > > nil suspend > It terminates a UI process if evaluated from anywhere using CMD+d :D > > Cheers, > Alex > > > > > -- > > Guille Polito > Research Engineer > > Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille > CRIStAL - UMR 9189 > French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr > > Web: http://guillep.github.io > Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13 >
