Hi Peter Now we do not want to rely on Glamour. You should pay attention since it is not maintained and producing memory leaks and we would like to avoid to have to fight to find them. I do not know what are the plans of feenk at this level. This is why we started to redesign Spec.
Stef On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 31 Mar 2018, at 17:17, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> What does this means for end users? >> >> >> nothing. >> we are removing some *users* of glamour. >> Not glamour itself and certainly not the gttools that use glamour >> intensively (and they allow easy extension). > > > Aaah. My heart skipped originally, now I am at peace. :) > >> ps: but there are leaks around we would like to discover how and when they >> happen (because they are not so many and not evident). Any help there is >> welcome :) > > > I'll keep that in mind, although I don't usually check whether there are any > pointers dangling. > > Thanks! > Peter
