Despite the interleavement, the order of the grouped elements as they occurred in the original collection could be preserved.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Damien Pollet <damien.pol...@gmail.com> wrote: > The problem is, there isn't really an order to preserve in the first place, > since even if the original collection is a sequencable one, the elements of > each group would be interleaved in it. I could see the point of sorting the > keys though. > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 18:32, Petr Fischer via Pharo-dev > <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> wrote: >> >> Hello, I found a useful method in the collection - groupedBy: - the result >> container is some PlugableDictionary (integer variant) and group order >> (keys) is not preserved. >> >> Would not it be better to choose some other Dictionary variant, which >> preserve the order of groups (like in source Collection)? >> >> pf >> > > > -- > Damien Pollet > type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
