> Am 13.10.2018 um 11:09 schrieb Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com>: > > > >> On sam. 13 oct. 2018 at 10:42, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >> I don‘t want to kick off another war but shouldn‘t we add pharo as a >> language to github. Now it is a topic but the configurations for linguist >> are still tying it to smalltalk. >> >> Norbert >> >> > > Hi, > > Linguist find the language based on theee things: > - what is written on the .gitattribute file > - the extension of the file > - the source code (it compares it with examples) > > Since multiple Smalltalk shares FileTree format and Tonel format, the > extensions and source code will be the same for Pharo and other Smalltalk. > > Introducing a "Pharo" language would force everyone to add a .gitattribute > file to their project, and I'm sure not that many people will do it.
That is not a problem because the ones that want to distinguish do and the rest does not. But after sending the message I started to think it would only make sense when we switch the file ending to something else then .st Maybe to big a change and not important enough. Norbert > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr
