Torsten Bergmann <asta...@gmx.de> wrote: > The problem with the new vs. old streams seems to be that migration is > unfinished even for the base image. > Development already switched quickly to newer construction sites instead > of finishing these old ones.
There are indeed several open issues with the new streams usage. I posted one on the handling of filing in fileouts by drag and drop. The issue I see with existing code is mostly that an object is used as a stream but is actually an information holder which understands much more than the stream protocol. Rewriting that code to use a streamHolder can be non-trivial. The fallback behavior of a readWriteStream opened on a read-only file is also not easy to get right. Stephan
