Ok, there seems to be some agreeable sense. Dealing with accounts of people tends to collect opinions and things not related to pharo. We are not interested in these. There are hashtags and mentions for things related to a topic. But a few (!) want to have more control. So using the @pharoproject account should be ok because we can like things to be includef from that account. Well at least the ones that have access to.
Is this a proper summary? Norbert > Am 05.09.2019 um 08:48 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > > Yes, I closed that issue. > > This is not going to happen, sorry :) > > Esteban > >> On 5 Sep 2019, at 08:03, ducasse <steph...@netcourrier.com> wrote: >> >> Hi guys >> >> I encourage everybody to read this issue until the last conversation. >> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4491 >> >> I have problem to promote an aggregator that can contain tweets containing >> #abortionismurder inside.!!!!!!!!! >> And I have even more problem that this is in a tweet on Amber Weekly!!!! >> >> I do not know who is behind AmberSmalltalk tweets but for me this is clearly >> impossible to read this >> on a tweet that Pharo supports. >> >> I also have a problem to promote an aggregator account >> We can provide a list and people what they want. >> I do not like the idea of aggregation. So I vote against and I will ask the >> board to decide. >> >> Stef > >
