On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Norbert Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:55 +0200, Damien Cassou wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Norbert Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> - removed unnecessary columns Difficulty and Priority from Issue
>>
>> Should I remove them completely from the issue tracking system?
>>
>> Fixed                 = Developer made requested changes, QA should verify
>> Verified              = QA has verified that the fix worked
>> Invalid               = This was not a valid issue report
>> Duplicate             = This report duplicates an existing issue
>> WontFix               = We decided to not take action on this issue
>> Closed                = The fix has been treated and issue is closed
>>
>
> I don't understan. I removed the columns in the view as
> they are only disturbing. What do you mean by showing the
> list of statusses?

I meant:

Type-Defect          = Report of a software defect
Type-Enhancement     = Request for enhancement
Type-Task            = Work item that doesn't change the code or docs
Type-Patch           = Source code patch for review
Type-Other           = Some other kind of issue
Priority-High        = Strongly want to resolve in the specified milestone
Priority-Medium      = Normal priority
Priority-Low         = Might slip to later milestone
Difficulty-VeryEasy  = Anybody can fix that in a few seconds
Difficulty-Easy      = Only little knowledge and time required
Difficulty-Medium    = Knowledge and time required
Difficulty-Hard      = Requires more than one expert


-- 
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to