Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > now the questions are > - is it really that difficult to agree for a project on a given > simple license such as MIT? > - I also hate licenses since they polute our lives but I just don't > care and signed MIT > - should we accept this kind of license (of course it is compatible > with MIT) > but this looks a door open to the mess. > > I'm not sure squeakers realized that after all the effort of yohsiki > to get SqueakEtoys clean > 3.11 could be WTFPL because keith commit on it. > Thats a complete load of rubbish.
No. 1 I dont see any need for profanity. No. 2 my licence is not like GNU, please dont say it is because you will just confuse people. Its freer than MIT because I don't care if you take my code and sell it as your own. You can even say you wrote it if you like. The responsibility for what you do with it is yours not mine. Keith > I'm quite convinced that they will boycott such a code. > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
