Can't remember the number of times I've had to implement these kinds of generally useful methods on various Smalltalk dialects (particularly #groupedBy:, called it #categorizedBy: myself ;-) ). Really should be part of all Smalltalks. I'd push for general adoption/standardisation for every dialect! That's the only way Smalltalk is going to evolve, the "ANSI standard" is years behind!
Regards, Gary. > > So why do we do pharo. Really. If everything as to be compatible with > other > smalltalk. Terrible. > Can't we get smarter? > Why can't we tag the methods with <notAnsi> and build a tool that > check when you > do a fill out. I do not write code to be portable to VisualWorks so? > >> I would prefer to have such extension methods separate from the core. > > Me not. Because then in a lot of places I will have to inline their > body. > > Stef > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
