On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jérôme <[email protected]> wrote:
As I see it > * Andika has a look similar to Lucida Grande, the display font of > Mac > OS X and therefore fits better to the Watery2 theme, while at the same > time retains its own style. > Am 24.02.2009 um 18:56 schrieb Adrian Lienhard: > > > I looked at Andika with Marcus yesterday, and we both had the > > impression that Bitstream Vera fits better. Is there any advantage to > > the Andika font? Andika does not seem to provide a monotype too. > > > I have to say that Andika looks a little "Comic Sans Serif" to me, and agree that Bitstream Vera Sans "fits" better as well. I really hadn't bothered to put in my "vote" because I can change the font to whatever I want, but from a marketing perspective I think the Bitstream Vera may lend a more "professional" air to the product you are trying to sell. However, having said that, the Andika font proportions seem to be more readable (there is a nice difference in size between the upper and lower case letters), so perhaps "out of the box practicality" should trump "gee that looks great!" Unfortunately, you have now put me in a positions that I can't make up my own mind! Just thoughts! Take care, Rob
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
