yes Stef On Apr 9, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote:
> > Sounds reasonable. > > Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. Should it be an issue, > or should it be on one of the wiki pages? > > I searched, but found nothing. > > Is this the right page? > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm > > - on > > On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not >>> find an issue in the Pharo issues database.) >>> >>> I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have >>> been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to >>> stick with the old MC? >> >> -support >> -open and public repository aka SS2 >> -understanding >> -process >> -tools >> >> at least for me. >> So we will but not now our plate is quite full. >> >> Stef >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
