Speaking of which, how's the work on making Exupery (the JIT, not the VM
:) ) compatible with a Closure VM going?
Cheers,
Henry
On 24.04.2009 22:38, Bryce Kampjes wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 14:41 +0200, Michael Rueger wrote:
Bryce Kampjes wrote:
It's true that the packaging procedure could do with some more work.
When I originally started producing pre-packaged VMs for Exupery this is
what people wanted.
so is this an exupery VM or a "normal" one?
I just wrote a similar email like Nicolas, but then remembered this
thread :-)
Both.
An Exupery VM is a normal VM with a few extra primitives and a few hooks
to allow native code to be executed instead of interpreted code. If
Exupery isn't used it's just a normal VM.
For Windows there's more of a difference as I'm not maintaining the
Windows Exupery VM to the same level as the Linux one.
Bryce
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
