I'm using 10293cl and this fix still isn't integrated: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=724
Cheers, Hernán 2009/4/21 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>: > this is strange since I merge and do not load. > So I will redo that (reargh). > > Stef > On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > >> Pharo/Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.293 has been lost >> (overwritten by Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.294 which has >> Kernel-michael_rueger.renggli.292 as ancestor). >> >> Thus Pharo image 10287 miss Hernan stack top fix and a literals do: >> fix >> >> This can be repaired by merge tool though... >> While at it, why cannot we apply a chirurgical merge ? >> I mean select or reject item by item >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project