I'm using 10293cl and this fix still isn't integrated:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=724

Cheers,
Hernán

2009/4/21 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>:
> this is strange since I merge and do not load.
> So I will redo that (reargh).
>
> Stef
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>
>> Pharo/Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.293 has been lost
>> (overwritten by Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.294 which has
>> Kernel-michael_rueger.renggli.292 as ancestor).
>>
>> Thus Pharo image 10287 miss Hernan stack top fix and a literals do:
>> fix
>>
>> This can be repaired by merge tool though...
>> While at it, why cannot we apply a chirurgical merge ?
>> I mean select or reject item by item
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to