Yes but why don't we close them with an ensure or something like that. I mean is the logic of the connection making it that we cannot use ensure or this is just a legacy?
On Apr 30, 2009, at 7:20 PM, John M McIntosh wrote: > Well somewhere someone needs to close the socket before it is > *forgotten* > > On 30-Apr-09, at 5:29 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> I would like to know why does the system rely on finalisation to >> release socket >> Apparently david mentioned that this is the source of huge problems. >> So what would be the alternative? >> >> Stef > > -- > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > John M. McIntosh <[email protected]> Twitter: > squeaker68882 > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http:// > www.smalltalkconsulting.com > = > = > = > = > = > ====================================================================== > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
