>>> Hi guys
Here are the discussions we forgot to get on the list :) >> I was thinking that I would not do the license cleaning for 1.0 > > Yes, I agree. We can do this in 1.1, which can follow shortly after > 1.0. Any objections from Marcus, Mike? > > What is the status of "Main EToys removal, reorganize > MorphicExtras-"? Do you plan to do more for 1.0? > > Apart from that we have left on our list > (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones > ): > > - default in-image font(s) > - Package management system with stable and unstable distributions > - Remove SqueakMap and Installer from core > > - All tests green > - Clean up package and class category organization > - Pharo one-click image (including developer tools, GettingStarted > information, screenshots, ...) > - New sources file > > Are we going to integrate the new preference system/browser in 1.0? > >> Now we are waiting for eliot closures changes. > > What kind of changes are theses? Did he say something about when > they will be ready? Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
