I will load it by hand because apparently and I do not know why

CollectionsTests-GabrielOmarCotelli.353
is not found even if it is the repository.

Stef

On May 31, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:

> Hi Stef,
>
> I copy the pharo-core image to a clean location, update to 10321,  
> and later open the Pharo Inbox Repository and load the latest SLICE  
> I sent without problems. What files Monticello tell you that are  
> missing?
>
> I can send you a .cs or the .mcz's by mail if you want. But I think  
> this should load from Pharo Inbox.
>
> Just tell me anything you need.
>
> Gabriel
>
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected] 
> > wrote:
> Hi gabriel
>
> can you try to load your slice from the inbox but put the image in
> another place on your file disc (else the package cache
> will be used) because some other files are missing
>
> stef
>
> On May 30, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
>
> > I uploaded to Pharo Inbox... (hope this time works :) )
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]
> > > wrote:
> > Hi gabriel
> >
> > I cannot get CollectionsTests-Gabir....353
> > could publish it in the inbox?
> >
> > Stef
> > On May 30, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > continuing with licensing issues I push on Pharo-Inbox: SLICE-
> > > RelicensingIV-GabrielOmarCotelli.2
> > >
> > > Including the next:
> > >
> > > Added check for negative to Character>>value: for raising a better
> > > error message and a test case covering this
> > >
> > > Removed:
> > > - StandardFileMenu class>>oldFileFrom:withPattern: (no senders on
> > > any pharo image, the only one that appears is a sender to the
> > > instance message of same name)
> > > - Form class>>rgbMul (no senders)
> > > - ExternalStructureInspector (no references)
> > > - ServerDirectory class>>transferServerDefinitionsToExternal (no
> > > senders)
> > >
> > > Several changes from Yoshiki in Squeak relicensing (reverted to
> > > clean versions or reimplemented) (If someone needs the exact  
> list of
> > > methods I can generate this)
> > >
> > > Now the dirty methods count should be 46 (I don't run the audit
> > > however).
> > >
> > > Please review.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gabriel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- 
> project
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to