Pentium 4 2.26 GZ, windows XP SP3, 2GB RAM

168199737 bytecodes/sec; 3670275 sends/sec

2009/7/16 Benoit St-Jean <bstj...@yahoo.com>

> If that helps...
>
> 0 tinyBenchmarks
>
> Windows XP, 2002, SP3
> Pentium 4, dual core, 3Ghz, 2 Gb RAM
>
> All tests were run 5 times and here are the averages :
>
> Some comparisons:
>
> Squeak 3.9 latest update: #7067
> 76297334 bytecodes/sec; 3397437 sends/sec
>
> Squeak 3.10.2 latest update: #7179
> 74839234 bytecodes/sec; 3443964 sends/sec
>
> Pharo 0.1 latest update: #10377
> 75877223 bytecodes/sec; 3134820 sends/sec
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------
> Benoit St-Jean
> Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean
> Blog: lamneth.wordpress.com
> A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero.
> (Albert Einstein)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Gary Chambers <gazzagu...@btinternet.com>
> *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:51:59 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few
> observations
>
> In the Windows camp, Watery2 theme...
>
> Vista 64bit (32bit VM, of course), 4GB DDR2-800, Q9550 (2.8GHz),
> Pharo0.1Core-10371.
>
> 0 tinyBenchmarks '569205113 bytecodes/sec; 16188534 sends/sec'
>
> Time millisecondsToRun: [
> Browser fullOnClass: Object selector: #at:.
> World displayWorld] 373
>
> Older laptop, XP, 1GB, Pentium M (1.73 GHz)...
>
> 0 tinyBenchmarks '294761082 bytecodes/sec; 8530869 sends/sec'
>
> Time millisecondsToRun: [
> Browser fullOnClass: Object selector: #at:.
> World displayWorld] 677
>
> Still feels quite responsive even on that!
>
> Regards, Gary
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Schwab,Wilhelm K" <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu>
> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>; <alain.plan...@free.fr>
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
>
>
> On my crusty old Linux box:
>
>     155339805 bytecodes/sec; 3931964 sends/sec
>
> However, I always like to test on less than my customers will have, so by
> some arguments, this machine is just about right.
>
> Bill
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Alain Plantec
> [alain.plan...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:19 PM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
>
> Adrian Lienhard a écrit :
> > Bill,
> >
> > Could you post the results of the following benchmark?
> >
> > 0 tinyBenchmarks
> >
>
> > On my MacBook Pro with 2.4GHz and the Mac 4.1.1beta2U VM I get:
> >
> > '543236074 bytecodes/sec; 12101592 sends/sec'
> >
> On Intel Core2 Duo T7700  at 2.4 GHz, Linux Ubuntu 9.04, 64 bit
> pharo-core : #10379 '585812356 bytecodes/sec; 14531440 sends/sec'
> pharo : #10373 '574312955 bytecodes/sec; 14261923 sends/sec'
>
> not so bad with linux  :)
>
> Cheers
> Alain
>
> > Cheers,
> > Adrian
> >
> > On Jul 15, 2009, at 22:34 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Stef,
> >>
> >> No browser should be that slow.  I suspect the Linux vm is not a
> >> speed demon, the xp machines I use are heavily burdened by anit-
> >> virus software and other performance drains, etc.  My linux box at
> >> home might be further hindered by the fact that I bought a wide
> >> screen monitor for it, and use LOTS of screen real estate.  Still,
> >> when I compare Pharo with other software (including Dolphin) under
> >> similarly abusive conditions, Pharo is not quick.
> >>
> >> This particular image is small; it is based on the most recent web
> >> image, and is 22 MB.  It has some of my Seaside code in it, but has
> >> not yet executed same.  I have a couple of Seaside cleanup
> >> expressions that help when images bloat up, but looking at the
> >> current size makes me think I'm missing an opportunity.  All that
> >> aside, on my linux box, I find that after the saving cursor
> >> disappears, it can take a few seconds for the image to again become
> >> responsive.  On xp in my office, there is at least a second of down
> >> time after the cursor reverts to normal.
> >>
> >> In doing some SIF imports, I noted that it was hard to tell when the
> >> image was still busy.  I have no idea how long it should take to do
> >> the work it was doing, but it took long enough that some gentle
> >> prodding becomes irresistable: "is it done yet?"  I remember lots of
> >> debate about Cursor class>>showWhile: on Dolphin; it might be one of
> >> those things that is tricky to get right.
> >>
> >> A little bit nicer news: I have it running on my office machine
> >> (xp), with FreeType in use, and it's ok with the standard tools and
> >> the w2k theme.
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >> [mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >> ] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:31 PM
> >> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few
> >> observations
> >>
> >>
> >>> Stef,
> >>>
> >>> In terms of response times, even with a lot of things turned off, I
> >>> was still surprised at how long it takes to change from even one
> >>> method to another.
> >>>
> >> which browser are you using.
> >> Because the old browser should not be that slow.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Anything past 0.2 sec (or whatever that threshold is) starts to add
> >>> up; Pharo sometimes takes up to a second, which is _really_ shows up.
> >>>
> >>> Saving an image is not necessarily quick either, I _think_
> >>> particuarly
> >>> on Linux??
> >>>
> >> What is the size of your image: here jannik generated an image of
> >> 800 mb.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Also, I get the sense the wait cursors are displayed, on Linux, for a
> >>> smaller fraction of the down time than on Windows.
> >>>
> >>> Bill
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >>> [mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >>> ] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:58 PM
> >>> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few
> >>> observations
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hello all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I managed to create an install script; as I suspected would be case,
> >>>> it was very anticlimactic.  I tried creating a password-protected
> >>>> directory under my personal web site, but that did not go well.  The
> >>>> authentication is weird, so it was probably asking a lot.  A
> >>>> directory repository worked.
> >>>>
> >>> Good to know
> >>>
> >>>> Does Monticello/PackageInfo see a change in method category (aka
> >>>> package) as a change to the package?
> >>>>
> >>> normally it should.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> It appears not, and it worries me a little in that it seems to make
> >>>> it easy to lose work by forgetting to save it.  Do any of you script
> >>>> saving your packages?
> >>>>
> >>> you can check in ScriptLoader to see how we compute the packages that
> >>> changed (not only dirty but also new packages)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The results are untested at present, but I used SIF to transfer a
> >>>> fair amount of code into Pharo.  To cope with the naming of the ODBC
> >>>> classes, I ended up doing things like Smalltalk at:#DBConnection
> >>>> put:ODBCConnection, and that worked out nicely, at least AFAICT at
> >>>> this stage.  SIF finally ended up complaining about running out of
> >>>> items when processing the last file.  I reserve the right to later
> >>>> report that it was a miserable failure, but it looks like I most of
> >>>> the code imported.
> >>>>
> >>>> Using the standard tools, the w2k theme, disabling faded backgrounds
> >>>> and enabling fast drag, performance on an older Linux system is ok
> >>>> (more or less).  There are still things that take too long,
> >>>>
> >>> like what?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> and Pharo's responses are no better (sometimes worse) than even
> >>>> software running over a remote desktop connection.  We need a speed
> >>>> boost, but judicious settings help a little.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a way to disable the anti-aliased fonts?  In fairness, I
> >>>> should try turning that off to see if any speed boost is worth the
> >>>> price.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Pharo-project mailing list
> >>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Pharo-project mailing list
> >>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Pharo-project mailing list
> >>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> ------------------------------
> Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet
> Explorer® 8. Optimized for Yahoo! *Get it Now for Free! 
> *<http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to