Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > On Jul 17, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Douglas Brebner wrote: > >> Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> The problem doug is that it is unclear if all the features are >>> needed and what is the status of the implementation. I do not >>> know what are orphanage, scripts, upgrade upgrade, file....... >> Well, it was my understanding that this version of MC, PackageInfo >> and Installer were the ones which were intended to become the >> portable versions that all Squeak forks would use. > > > Well yes this is the intention of keith. It was a bold challenge. Now > if you look at Installer you get a lot of things you do not need.
True, but this was just an attempt to get MC loaded. I'd expect quite a lot could be trimmed. >>> Now the key point is that if somebody in the pharo community >>> stand up and take the **huge** and painful job to have a **real** >>> look at MC1.5/1.6 and to be here as a fireman then there is a >>> chance that we use it. Not just saying yes it works (which is >>> already a challenge as I noticed it these days). >> Yes, but my response was only to do with solving the the loading >> problem you had. Not that every MC problem had been solved :) > > ;) Anyway this is a long way to go but we should go there step by > step. Welcome to pharo. Thank you :) I've been away from Squeak for a while due to the problems it's had but one of the reasons I came back was seeing what was happening with Pharo :) _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
