Miguel, First, thanks for reading it! I am certainly open to the breaking changes (Dolphin semantics) option, as it would put an end to silent failures. Waiting is fine, as there is nothing to stop me from using the additional protocol until we can make the changes.
Anybody else? Bill -----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:31 AM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Draft streams proposal on the Wiki El mié, 12-08-2009 a las 15:52 +0200, Stéphane Ducasse escribió: > > Stef, > > > > Please take a quick look at the StreamsForRobustSoftware page on the > > Wiki. It needs a lot of work, but any hints about how to make it > > meet your needs would be appreciated. I read your proposal and I think that we should go for the breaking changes option, but not for this first release. Respect to the Squeak incompatibility, Pharo tries to be better for the better and not care for incompatibilities. I think that this kind of problems should be solved from the root and not keeping adding workarounds because that means that never will be corrected/deleted from the code. -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
