Fair enough.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 3:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Line end convention in MultiByteFileStream send code :) Stef On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > I saw that, but one wonders whether we might be alone and should > just stop whining :) I cannot understand how ignoring errors is a > feature, but maybe it is to some??? One argument against the idea is > that the file could grow very large over time, but it should not be > too bad, and I would certainly want to know if my image is generating > huge numbers of unhandled execeptions. That is all the more true on > servers and embedded systems. > > A possible compromise is something I did a while back and need to > press back into service: a rotating (for lack of a better name) file > stream. It uses one stream for a set period of time, then opens a new > file and begins writing to it. It leaves a seriies of files named for > when they were opened. I did it to avoid having something get hung up > (the concern was mostly defective USB drivers) and taking out all of > our data from an experiment vs. just costing us the last ten minutes > worth. Something even simpler could probably work here. > > Bill > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected] > ] On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 12:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Line end convention in > MultiByteFileStream > > In another thread I asked to count one vote plus for this. > > > Em 22/08/2009 13:56, Schwab,Wilhelm K < [email protected] > > escreveu: > > > Something else that I would very much like to see done to the debug > log is to append new entries vs. overwriting them. A lot of useful > information is destroyed that way. What do others think? > > Bill > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected] > ] On Behalf Of Damien Cassou > Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 11:35 AM > To: Pharo Development > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Line end convention in > MultiByteFileStream > > About PharoDebug.log: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1082 > > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them > popular by not having them." James Iry > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
