2009/10/29 George Herolyants <george.herolya...@gmail.com> > 2009/10/29 Dennis Schetinin <chae...@gmail.com>: > > For me it's not clear at all. But this is much more obvious: > > > > stack := self resultOf: [self shouldBeEmpty]. > > > > So why to use a block then? And stop, why to use "resultOf:"??? >
For the same reason the execution of the test was being wrapped by original #given: (maybe we have to ask author?) > >> And by "declarative" I meant > >> the way you specify dependencies between your tests. If it was done > >> your way, test would be performed twice. > > > > Why? > > Don't you expect the block to be evaluated? > > >> > >> If you use symbol, you don't > >> have to do it (haven't seen the library yet, just guessing :). > > > > Don't have to do what? > > Don't have to execute method shouldBeEmpty twice. > Sorry, I don't understand. My variant was exactly the same as (unknown:) original one but using explicit message send instead of hiding it by selector passing. Including number of #shouldBeEmpty executions. -- Dennis Schetinin
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
