2009/11/13 Martin McClure <mar...@hand2mouse.com>: > Igor Stasenko wrote: >> No, please no more inilining hacks. :) >> If someone wants to run everything at light speed - just code in C, >> but leave smalltalk honoring the >> message passing. >> And besides, these tricks won't make any difference when having good >> inlining JIT. >> In bytecode, they just add a complexity to compiler and headache to >> developers. > > +64 to banning bytecode compiler hacks and instead concentrate on > producing an inlining JIT. > > -Martin >
The former is very easy, ugly and cheap. The later neither is easy nor cheap, and i doubt many of us will concentrate on this. Unless "concentrate" means "wait for Eliot's changes and pray". This can be reformulated as "don't bother on such details untill then". ;) Nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
