On Dec 17, 2009, at 2:14 PM, keith wrote: > Stef, > > I don't think you understand. > > You had access to the repository squeakfoundation.org/39a, you the > privileged elite, release teams etc could contribute to the head of > SUnit, it was a closed project. squeaksource.com/Testing was proposed > as the new head of SUnit, it is not for anyone to say let's use this > its really cool. It is not something to be adopted if it is cool or > not. It is the head of the community development that is SUnit. If it > is not cool, then squeaksource.com/Testing is the place to go to fix it. > > It doesnt matter whether the code in squeaksource.com/Testing is > rubbish,
No you take responsibilities for a choice. > it was important to adopt it as an exercise in recognizing > and supporting the communities efforts to make progress rather than to > undermine them. To carry on using the version that is in the closed > repository only did one thing, that was to undermine the input that > went into the "head" project at squeaksource.com/Testing, and it sent > the message out that contributions are not wanted. > > You say you are rewriting PackageInfo, you could have rewritten the > version that is in MC1.5, and built on what was going before. No I'm rewriting from scratch. A real package not based on conventions. There are too much behavior in the existing one. But people may use what I'm doing or not. Before this is not working I have to shut up. > > Keith > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
