Em 15/01/2010 19:48, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> escreveu:
> Hi guys > may be I'm wrong but I have the impression that fixing tests as > soon as they are broken in the Unstable branch could be better. Now > doing that may stall our energy. I think it would reduce the [apparent] speed of new functionality, but not "stall our energy" which I surmise is to have a cool but as bug free as possible Pharo Smalltalk. > So what do you think? Doing this way, as some red tests get on the pile without resolution we can get more attention to the issues. It's a mixture of the Toyota process with a Kanban for squashing the bugs! > May be an alternate process is to make progress and to do green > test session from time to time. Except if we could be _so_ assertive about the non importance of some of the non passing tests, I think the time to time should be as short as today! OK, as a concession could we try to have these gates about every two weeks? -- Cesar Rabak _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
