Yes of course.
Now since only a subpart of the system was using it it means that 
imageSegment are most of the time reloaded.
So this is clearly a neat idea but not fully  working.

Stef

On Jan 17, 2010, at 10:27 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:

> I think you'll find it's documented in the class
> ImageSegmentRootStub
> 
> It's all tied up in image segments, projects, etoys and the like, so in the 
> past an attempt to ensure 
> that objects (classes) that were bundled up and stuffed into an image segment 
> aren't faulted back in 
> unless you really mean it... 
> 
> users of this are interesting, see for example 
> Dictionary>>at:ifPresentAndInMemory: 
> 
> On 2010-01-17, at 1:10 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> 
>> isInMemory
> 
> --
> ===========================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <[email protected]>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> ===========================================================================
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to