Ok, thanks for the answer Lukas. Then i would ask the O2 developers, why is the fork needed? Just curious, because if 02 copies a lot from OB, to add more functionality why that extra features cant be part of OB?
My point is that i don't understand if OB is no extensible enough for building O2, or just because it was easier to fork. Many thanks, Fernando On Jan 20, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > O2 is a fork of OB. > > The duplication of the complete code-base is necessary, because O2 > makes incompatible changes to the OmniBrowser framework. The way O2 is > implemented makes it impossible to run both together on the same core > model without conflicts. > > Lukas > > -- > Lukas Renggli > http://www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
