Shouldn't be obvious I guess (1 tinyBenchmarks '566998892 bytecodes/sec; 16433596 sends/sec') here.
Regards, Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Stasenko" <siguc...@gmail.com> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] A dog-slow browser > 2010/1/20 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>: >> >> On Jan 20, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> >>> 2010/1/20 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>: >>>> In 1.1? >>>> >>>> Stef >>>>>>> Please, don't take it as a offense, but as a constructive critics :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pharo-core browser is awfully slooow! >>>> >>>> can you provide some reproducable data? >>>> that we can compare? >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, but i have no time to prove the obvious. >>> You could just start the trunk image at anytime and see it yourself. >>> >>> Two images running on same VM , same machine.. a lot of difference. >> >> >> >> Maybe this is the caching of FileStream? This should make a difference on >> a slow >> machine... >> > Caching should in contrary increase the speed, isnt? > And i wouldn't say that my machine is slow > CPU0: AMD Phenom(tm) 8450 Triple-Core Processor stepping 03 > '85618729 bytecodes/sec; 4708854 sends/sec' > > >> Marcus >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de >> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
