Ah, well if you can build your own VM, then it would be easy to add as a named primitive.
On 2010-03-02, at 4:34 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> Well it seems rather special purpose. What are you using it for? >> Why is the cost impacting your work? > > There is an excellent paper at oopsla'09 that shows the method call graph can > be effectively inferred using the method call stack depth: > http://www-plan.cs.colorado.edu/klipto/mytkowicz-oopsla09.pdf > > Executing "[ running sender notNil ] whileTrue: [ running := running sender. > depth := depth + 1]" before each method execution of my application terribly > slows it down. > > Cheers, > Alexandre -- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <john...@smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com =========================================================================== _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
