On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:35 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Hi folks. Today I were talking with Noury and from our point of view, there > is a bug in the Class references. > > Forget about refactoring browser. Right now, if you look for the references > of a class, it ONLY searches literal matches in the source code of methods. > It doesn't take into account for example if you have subclasses. In the > abstract speaking, if there are subclasses, isn't that considered a reference > ?
Yes I agree got bitten by this one. > Even more, the tool would be much more useful if it can find such > information. Several times, I look for references of a class I don't know and > that I think it can be removed. I look references, zero. Excellent, I can > removed. But then....I realized it has a subclass and that class is > referenced in 200000 places...fresh example: > DummySuperclassOfColorPickerMorph. > > In summary, it would be great if subclasses can be tacking into account also. > Or at least I don't know, create another menu entry for that... > > I am the only one who think that ? what is your opinion ? > > Cheers > > Mariano > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
