On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

2010/3/29 laurent laffont <[email protected]>


On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Levente Uzonyi <[email protected]> wrote:

On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, laurent laffont wrote:

 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Levente Uzonyi <[email protected]> wrote:

 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, laurent laffont wrote:

 2010/3/29 John M McIntosh <[email protected]>


 So what Ghz is this machine?



 model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU         T7200  @ 2.00GHz
cpu MHz         : 1994.987
cache size      : 4096 KB


There must be something wrong. My T8300 notebook had about 550M
bytecodes/sec and 15M sends/sec on linux. With the stock windows vm I
have
500M bytecodes/sec and 14.5M sends/sec.


With the source I have provided ? 32bits ?


My linux vm was 32-bit with some older sources. Since I don't have linux
on my notebook anymore I can't tell which version it was.




 On MacOSX, same laptop, with Squeak VM 4.2.2 beta 1U from pharo website

449122807 bytecodes/sec; 9649554 sends/sec
405384006 bytecodes/sec; 9584683 sends/sec
445604873 bytecodes/sec; 10138464 sends/sec
445993031 bytecodes/sec; 10102544 sends/sec
446381865 bytecodes/sec; 10174641 sends/sec

compared to Linux


Squeak VM 3.11.3 -r 2135 + FT2Plugin + --CFLAGS="-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-mfpmath=sse -march=native -s -mtune=generic"
==========================================
339072847 bytecodes/sec; 9560580 sends/sec
338848444 bytecodes/sec; 9552573 sends/sec
338177014 bytecodes/sec; 9473233 sends/sec
337953795 bytecodes/sec; 9496896 sends/sec
338848444 bytecodes/sec; 9496896 sends/sec

so it seems there's  improvements that can be done on Linux VM, but there's
not so much difference.


I think everybody know this and that your results is the expected. I even
remember some threads were we discussed the same. For example, I found this
one:

http://n4.nabble.com/Pharo-apparently-slow-on-linux-td1304643.html#a1304643

but there are more.
The MacOS VM is faster than the rest, even with the same PC.

You know that's simply bullshit, do you?


Levente

I have no idea how to improve Linux's one, thus.

Cheers

Mariano




Laurent Laffont



 Levente



Laurent Laffont





Levente



 Laurent Laffont



 On 2010-03-28, at 10:42 AM, laurent laffont wrote:

Thank you !

Here the result:

Squeak VM 3.11.3 -r 2135 + FT2Plugin + --CFLAGS="-O3
-fomit-frame-pointer
-mfpmath=sse -march=native -s -mtune=generic"
==========================================
339072847 bytecodes/sec; 9560580 sends/sec
338848444 bytecodes/sec; 9552573 sends/sec
338177014 bytecodes/sec; 9473233 sends/sec
337953795 bytecodes/sec; 9496896 sends/sec
338848444 bytecodes/sec; 9496896 sends/sec

so the best performance I have so far.

Laurent Laffont


 --


===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <[email protected]>   Twitter:
 squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.
http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com


===========================================================================





_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project



 _______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project



_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project



_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project



_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to