On Apr 6, 2010, at 3:00 AM, James Ladd wrote: > Hi All, > > > > > jarober says: > > > > >The reason these "Smalltalk for .NET" and "Smalltalk for the JVM" > > >projects never seem to come off is simple - Smalltalk isn't just flat > > >text in an editor. Smalltalk is the entire interactive environment. > > >It would be fairly simple to get a syntax parser, but it wouldn't be > > >Smalltalk. It would be Ruby or Python with Smalltalk syntax. > > >Somewhat useful perhaps, but not really Smalltalk. > > > > That is so true! Smalltalk is more than just flat text in an editor, which is > why Redline Smalltalk is different. I'm trying to bring out some new features > that would even make die-hard Smalltalk environment users envious, and at > the same time not make barriers to an uptake by more developers.
like what? > > > Sorry, but I believe that it is the way that had to take commercial > > Smalltalk. It surprises to me that Cincom and company do not see it. > > Well I'd be really happy to do this full-time with Cincom support (if they are > listening), and if it can remain free and open source. Cincom? > > Rgs, James. > > Australia's #1 job site If It Exists, You'll Find it on SEEK > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
