On Apr 3, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> Hi Marcus. I have been testing a little the one click image and I found the
> following things:
>
> - splash.bmp says release candidate 2. It should be release stable 1.0 or
> RC3.
This comes from the vm package. I personally honestly don't understand
spash-screens. Is windows so
slow in loading an image file?
>
> - There is the __MACOSX folder...should be remove. Remember yemuzip ;)
>
Ok, I will use that.
> - In Linux VM, you pass the parameter -encoding latin1 to the VM.
> Shouldn't this be UTF-8 ? I don't know.
>
Me neither.
> - In /Contents/Resources not only is PharoV10.sources but also
> SqueakV39.sources. Shouldn't SqueakV39.sources be deleted ? even more it
> size 16MB!!
>
deleted.
> - The name of the zip of the 1.0 maybe should have a name different
> than:Pharo-1.0-10515-rc3dev.zip, for example Pharo-1.0-OneClick.
> Notice the OneClick as part of the name
>
fixed.
> - In linux there are 2 failing test:
> TestIdenting >> testNewLineLeaveSpacesOnOldLine
> TestIdenting >> testCR2
> They are not new. I even try to ask help and Laurent too some time ago. I
> would like someone to analyze them. If it is a problem of the test, I would
> remove them. If there is nothing wrong with the test, I would try to analyze
> how to fix it.
>
If anyone has a vm that I should put that is good, I put it. Else I let it like
this.
I got completely lost with which linux vm to use...
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
