On Apr 22, 2010, at 10:21 20AM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:25 29AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>
>> On 4/21/2010 4:32 AM, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
>>> A question: Art the ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 and Pharo 1.0 the same?
>>> Or if there is a difference what is the impact of it?
>>>
>>> Or put the question in another way. If I code an UI using the
>>> ToolBuilder in Squeak 4.1 will it run in Pharo?
>>
>> They are mostly the same but not identical. If there is interest in the
>> Pharo community we should merge the versions upstream in
>> http://www.squeaksource.com/ToolBuilder.html (contact me if you're
>> interested).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Andreas
>
> ToolBuilder is one of the projects I believe deserve to stay fork-agnostic.
>
> Exactly how we should go about coordinating so they stay in synch I'm
> interested in hearing :)
>
> With ToolBuilder, I also include the protocol of UIManagers.
> In that regard, one of the changes I think would be hard to get "Pharoers" to
> back down from, is the change of nil instead of '' return for request: dialog
> cancels.
>
> Cheers,
> Henry
>
Should of course be noted, if you take a look in a Pharo image, this change has
not been reflected in the ToolBuilder UIManager comment, nor the
MorphicUIManager, just in the PSUIManager which is the default manager in
Pharo. (Don't see that changing anytime soon though :) )
Cheers,
Henry
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
