Thanks fernando this is cool to see that we are building a mindshare here.

> 
> I understand, the Collections in Smalltalk are heterogeneous, and putting 
> arithmetic behavior conceptually breaks that design. ( Same as Object gets a 
> ton of  awful behavior now! )
> 
> I like this new viewpoint, and will adopt it!
> 
> Fernando
> 
> 
> On May 18, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> 
>> I do not like this protocol and the way it is done because what if I want 
>> one that is not in the list.
>> 
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> On May 18, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck 
>>> <marianop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Fernando olivero <olive...@lu.unisi.ch> 
>>> wrote:
>>> I see now that they were moved to an external package in Squeaksource.
>>> 
>>> And it is not loaded by default in PharoCore1.1.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Do you think this should be included in PharoDev?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> it is working in Pharo 1.1 ? does it have tests?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Fernando
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 18, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
>>> 
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=332
>>>> 
>>>> PS. How about the Collection -> Math functions protocol?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Henry
>>>> 
>>>> On May 18, 2010, at 10:41 53AM, Fernando olivero wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry, i meant
>>>>> 
>>>>>> In PharoCore 1.1
>>>>>>    Collection organization listAtCategoryNamed: 'arithmethic' #()
>>>>> 
>>>>>> In Pharo1.0
>>>>>>   Collection organization listAtCategoryNamed: 'arithmetic'  #(#* #+ #- 
>>>>>> #/ #'//' #'\\' #raisedTo:)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 18, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Fernando olivero wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> In Pharo1.0
>>>>>>    Collection organization listAtCategoryNamed: 'arithmethic' #()
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In PharoCore1.1
>>>>>>   Collection organization listAtCategoryNamed: 'arithmetic'  #(#* #+ #- 
>>>>>> #/ #'//' #'\\' #raisedTo:)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And the arithmethic is not an extension of any Package.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why are all the methods in that category no present in PharoCore?
>>>>>> How and when are they added into Pharo ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Fernando
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to