Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > Now can we do it better :) what I would love it if we can have > SystemOrganization be an instance variable of the SystemDictionary and > may be returned by the categorizer message sent to Smalltalk globals. > This way each instance of SystemDictionary would have its own > SystemOrganizer instance. >
Sounds good. I might be able to do that if I had more detail. Also, until that refactoring is done, it would be helpful to make SystemOrganizer easier to use - if not the method, maybe at least the class comment? Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > This will make sure that people > can experiment with alternate semantics and that we do not have one > monolitic system :) > Sounds interesting (even though I'm not sure exactly what that means, lol). Maybe I'll do a little digging here... Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Feature-SystemOrganizer-class-default-returns-SystemOrganization-tp2221394p2221458.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
