exactly... my thought is running these automatically and headless. you
don't necessarily need it built into the test framework itself. You
can just have another process that monitors and kills after a timeout.
This is why i commented on the granularity.  The feature Andreas
describes would be used more comprehensively than this.  but i'm not
so fussed by that.

cheers,
Mike

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
> For me the point is that I have the impression that this is an interesting 
> feature to have
> when we have a test server. Like that you make sure that you do not have 
> tests with infinite recursion
> now this is also true that on a test server you do not really care if your 
> tests take 30s or 2 min.
>
> Stef
>
>> We already have #should:notTakeMoreThan: and friends in TestCase. The
>> complete TestCase can be protected by overriding #runCase, the
>> individual test by wrapping the code of the test method.
>>
>> Lukas
>>
>> On 29 May 2010 16:43, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu> wrote:
>>> Stef,
>>>
>>> Time to expose some of my ignorance (don't worry, I have plenty more 
>>> waiting where I found this): what is the tag concept?  That sounds very 
>>> Tweak-ish, and I am a real believer in doing things "with the language, not 
>>> TO the language" whenever possible.  That is not to say that frameworks are 
>>> bad; in fact, it means that frameworks are good, language extensions are 
>>> anywhere from suspect to evil.
>>>
>>> I have some code that I am still porting, but the basic idea is to be able 
>>> to write
>>>
>>> [
>>>   "code that might not complete"
>>>
>>> ] tryForSeconds:10 onTimeOut:[
>>>
>>> ].
>>>
>>> With a robust capability to do such things, it is probably not necessary 
>>> (or even appropriate) for TestCase to enforce timeouts.  The timeout block 
>>> can simply raise an exception or assert false, and there is no need to 
>>> disable timeouts where they do not belong.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr 
>>> [pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Michael Roberts 
>>> [m...@mjr104.co.uk]
>>> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2010 6:17 AM
>>> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] SUnit Time out
>>>
>>> yes think it's a good idea. I'm not sure the granularity that's
>>> required though.
>>>
>>> mike
>>>
>>> On Saturday, May 29, 2010, stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> in Squeak andreas introduced the idea of test time out
>>>> Do you think that this is interesting?
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>> SUnit
>>>> -----
>>>> All test cases now have an associated timeout after which the test is 
>>>> considered failed. The purpose of the timeout is to catch issues like 
>>>> infinite loops, unexpected user input etc. in automated test environments. 
>>>> Timeouts can be set on an individual test basis using the <timeout: 
>>>> seconds> tag or for an entire test case by implementing the 
>>>> #defaultTimeout method.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to