Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > I think we should not reinvent the wheel in Pharo. I mean, Morphic is > nice, although I would like to have native windows so that I can use my > Mac expose features. But no, I have only one window. Then, I have > something similar but implemented in Pharo using Mac + narrows. > > Then, you can have more than one workspace in the OS, why we need to > implement the same in Pharo ? > > I also have tons of image, and each image (or more than one) for a > project. Why don't you use your own OS virtual workspaces and spread you > different images over the different workspaces? that's easier than Squeak > Projects. And maybe faster and better supported. >
Agree .... mind you I don't use spaces :) Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > The ONLY problem is what people said about updating issues in all images. > But, : > > - In Pharo we have a good package management system now (Metacello). If > you use it correctly, you can define all your project dependencies (even > working in a core or dev image). So you should be able to load your > project in any image without any problem. > Yep, I already mentioned that in my first reply here -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Can-I-use-Projects-in-Pharo-tp2239170p2241332.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
