> Maybe this is the time to re-visit/build upon SourceTalk ... but for > Monticello 1?
The problem is that SourceTalk is quite heavily targeted at Monticello 2. For example, projects directly map to Monticello 2 projects. Also I suspect that it would also require some additional tweaks to really make it scale better than SqueakSource in the next 10 years. I am still waiting for Monticello 2 to finally come out. It would be so much a step forward. And we would get rid of the legacy SqueakSource code. Lukas > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/squeaksource-is-down-again-tp2266603p2268039.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
