We should also clean the package naming structure XXX XXX-Core XXX-Test-Core XXX-Foo XXX-Test-Foo
Stef On Jun 29, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > **Yes** I really want to come up with a pragma and to annotate tests to > populate the help. > > > On Jun 27, 2010, at 10:45 AM, laurent laffont wrote: > >> + More HelpSystem. >> + MetacelloRepository GUI, newbies struggle to find a package, must be easy. >> >> Laurent >> >> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Of course we will integrate changes and changes and improvements.... now I >> believe that it would be nice to build a common >> vision. Here what I would like to get in 1.2. >> >> Now it does not mean that this is a definitive list and that we will have >> the energy to do all but like >> that you know that you can put energy do build this common vision :) >> >> - better infrastructure for integrating rb composite queries into the >> system >> The idea is to introduce a superclass on top of >> systemDictionary and to define there an API that >> is compatible with the one of RB (and potentially modified the >> one of RB) >> >> - another step towards using announcement for system notification >> >> - better tools for dev >> >> - have a look at the RB change model so that we could get a real undo >> and changes >> >> - clean Monticello so that package logic stays in package so that we >> can plug RPackage into the system. >> Right now this looks too brittle to do anything >> >> - make sure that we can have RPackage on the side of PakageInfo (we >> got really nice benchmark) >> >> - New Compiler in beta >> >> - Helvetia hooks >> >> - ROME API >> >> - Sophie Event Hierarchy >> >> - Define some architectural action to get the system more modular >> >> - Hudson infrastructure >> >> - metacello to manage core >> >> - metacelloRepository for 1.0/1.1/1.2 >> Gofer >> >> - squeak collection optimisation? >> >> - Alien >> >> Open points: >> >> - What do we do with ToolBuilder? Not clear to me. >> >> - What should be done at the level of polymorph? >> - What should be done a the level of Pluggable**** >> can we use the fact that we have now block closure to >> get it better. >> >> As you guess it will not come simply but this is important that we all head >> towards a common understanding >> >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project