Taking about more future oriented stuff, I think it would be nice to have good support for document DBs (like CouchDB and MongoDB) and key/value stores (like Redis). At least for the former category of DBs, I know that a few people have been working on DB clients (see squeaksource.com) but I don't know how complete and stable they are.
Adrian On Jun 30, 2010, at 20:53 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Philippe this is good that you reacted. The point of esug is to support > actions > that will help people so probably XML-RCP is not a really good choice. > Now what would be good is to have a map of current techno and their support > for smalltalk. Then act to fill up the gaps. > > Stef > >> >> It doesn't strike me as a forward looking investment. IMHO XML-RCP is >> something that will only get used less in the future, not more. The >> value you get from an XML-RCP implementation will become less and less >> as fewer services support it. >> >> But then again ESUG is free to spend their money on what they seem fit. >> If they disagree or decide the current use is big enough, I have no >> problem at all with this. >> >> Cheers >> Philippe >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
