> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> how your server is backed up? >> Then we should pay attention not to end u having multiple of sources around >> before we can deal with the mess >> this may create. >> We got the ok from inria for a webdav server (the problem was that from a >> security view point, having >> an anonymous write was a no go. So now we will do >> - write only inbox >> - inputs are then checked to be only .mcz >> - then automatically copied to a readonly inbox >> - pharo* projects should be >> read and write for the people registered to the forge. > > > Great, this is only for Pharo or you want to mirror also Squeak projects ?
We do not know. For now at least the Pharo* repositories and the ones that are central XML-.... Ideally I would prefer to have everything in the same place and we have no problem hosting squeak projects. Now what is more important is build a kind of process to clean projects, there are a lot of projects which got created but - were never really used - are students code exercises So may be starting with a metacello config for every working one could be a start. The problem is that you lose all the nice aspects of squeak-source: UI to manage the commiters..... So we should check with the effort of dale and philippe and others on the gemstone version of squeaksource. Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project