On 8/4/2010 9:57 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi Adrei, excellent :)
BTW, for HTTP Client you should cc Andreas Raab or squeak mailing list....
Squeak-dev please
(http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-dev).
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Andrei Stebakov <lisper...@gmail.com
<mailto:lisper...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I also found that cookies were not correctly sent.
Every cookie was sent with its own "Cookie: " header which is not
correct.
I'm curious, why do you think that's incorrect? My understanding is that
RFC 2616 explicitly allows that:
"Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be present
in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that header field
is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]. It MUST be
possible to combine the multiple header fields into one 'field-name:
field-value' pair, without changing the semantics of the message, by
appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each separated by a
comma."
And the condition appears to be satisfied in RFC 2109 regarding the
Cookie header:
"The syntax for the header is:
cookie = "Cookie:" cookie-version
1*((";" | ",") cookie-value)
... "
Also cookie collection is too restrictive to the domain. Let's say
your request goes to www.domain.com <http://www.domain.com> and in
the cookies it'll have
domain.com <http://domain.com>.
Those cookies won't be collected since the current algorithm requires
it to match from the start of the string (probably should only match
the end of the string).
Yeah, that's a silly bug. Thanks for reporting.
Cheers,
- Andreas
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
