Lukas, OB, and the point is that it could be a whole lot easier to get a method into a particular package. I already offered the wiggle room that I'm using an older 1.1 image, so perhaps there things are fixed.
Bill ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Small tools rant Your explanation of step 1 to 6 is not understandable. Basic information is missing such as what browser you use, what you try to paste, what you have selected, what you filtered, how you filtered, what you are trying to achieve, etc. Lukas On 10 September 2010 21:35, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> wrote: > Stef, > > OBSystemBrowserAdaptor. It is a little old for 1.1, so that might be part of > the problem. I will have a look at the auto categorizer; it is highly > unlikley to be a solution to my problem, but it should contain the tricky > pieces. > > Bill > > > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse > [[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 3:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Small tools rant > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I spent some time this morning cleaning up the categorization of some of my >> code and noted that changing a method category goes something like this: (1) >> add a new method category; (2) there was no way to paste the desired name, >> fortunately at least the new one remained selected; (3) rename the newly >> added category and paste the desired name, adding the * in front of the >> name; (4) the browser is now filtered to the new category, so nothing is >> displayed; (5) display all methods again and hunt down the one to be >> changed; (6) drag it to the new category (after finding same). > > which browser do you use? > >> >> It is unlikely that I will wade into the tools any time soon; my skills are >> elsewhere (streams, sockets, etc.). I might be able to create something >> that would allow programmatic packaging of a compiled method. Does that >> already exist? > > auto categorizer? > >> >> Bill >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
