> One change that I don't understand, although it probably is unrelated, is in 
> [2]:
>
> LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #=!
> LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitAnd:!
> LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitOr:!
> LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitShift:!
> LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitXor:!
> LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #'~='!
>
> Why would one want to remove these primitive calls from large integers?

AFAIK, Cog needs those.

Lukas

-- 
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch

Reply via email to