> One change that I don't understand, although it probably is unrelated, is in > [2]: > > LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #=! > LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitAnd:! > LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitOr:! > LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitShift:! > LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #bitXor:! > LargePositiveInteger removeSelector: #'~='! > > Why would one want to remove these primitive calls from large integers?
AFAIK, Cog needs those. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch