On 08 Dec 2010, at 10:48, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Very cool framework, I like it a lot! I definitely vote to eventually > replace HTTPSocket with Zinc HTTP Components.
Thanks a lot, I am glad you like it. > I wonder why ZnFixedClient is not a subclass of ZnHttpClient? Well, ZnFixedClient is what I wrote earlier for my needs (I use it inside a T3RestJsonClient, then T3CachingRestJsonClient and finally a business specific T3Client, works very well). ZnHttpClient is Matt's later version, partially inspired by your idea of a builder-style API. > I think it would be cool to be able to use them polymorphic. We could maybe use some refactoring, consolidation, redesign (hint, hint). But for me, it is also a search for good solutions where I don't think that one size will fit all, but I could be wrong (for example, Matt's redirection, cookie and more advanced authoritzation support would be nice to have everywhere, it is just that I did not need it yet in my applications). Sven
