Hey Philippe,

On 18 Dec 2010, at 17:20, Philippe Marschall wrote:

> Is the response static or do you allocate a byte array for every
> response? Despite everything this benchmark is CPU limited.

You were right: I added caching (reuse on repeated requests) on repeated 
requests to my /bytes handler and I can now match your results on my machine 
(development image, interactive machine load):

[s...@voyager:~]$ ab -k -n 10000 -c 10 http://127.0.0.1:1701/bytes/16384
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/

Benchmarking 127.0.0.1 (be patient)
Completed 1000 requests
Completed 2000 requests
Completed 3000 requests
Completed 4000 requests
Completed 5000 requests
Completed 6000 requests
Completed 7000 requests
Completed 8000 requests
Completed 9000 requests
Completed 10000 requests
Finished 10000 requests


Server Software:        Zinc
Server Hostname:        127.0.0.1
Server Port:            1701

Document Path:          /bytes/16384
Document Length:        16384 bytes

Concurrency Level:      10
Time taken for tests:   4.319 seconds
Complete requests:      10000
Failed requests:        0
Write errors:           0
Keep-Alive requests:    10000
Total transferred:      165610000 bytes
HTML transferred:       163840000 bytes
Requests per second:    2315.37 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request:       4.319 [ms] (mean)
Time per request:       0.432 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate:          37446.17 [Kbytes/sec] received

Connection Times (ms)
              min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
Connect:        0    0   0.0      0       0
Processing:     0    4   1.6      4      30
Waiting:        0    4   1.5      4      27
Total:          0    4   1.6      4      30

Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
  50%      4
  66%      5
  75%      5
  80%      5
  90%      6
  95%      7
  98%      8
  99%      9
 100%     30 (longest request)

Benchmarking is indeed fun (and very dangereous and a time sink).

Sven


Reply via email to