>> May this is a ridiculuous thought but may be it would be good to start an >> effort on >> build a library for Smalltalk. Reusing some part of mondrian could be good. >> >> It would be very slow and really a lot of work. Mondrian is nice for >> visualization, but a Graph library is a lot more than that.
> But not starting means that we will never have anything. > If there are multiple people needed something this means that they can join > forces. > For Moose, mondrian, glamour, petitParser, RB.... nothing came out from a day > to the other one > this is just that some guys starred and continued to push. > Stef If there was a basic library for graphs then people who need specific graph algorithm implementations could contribute that implementation once they complete it for their application. By this means a more complete graph library would gradually evolve. All we need for now is a well designed framework for implementing graph algorithms in with implementations of some common algorithms. Regards, Ralph Boland -- Quantum Theory cannot save us from the tyranny of a deterministic universe but it does give God something to do
